The Black Market Exploiting The Donor - 1745 Words

Proposing a Solution to the Black Market Exploiting the Donor: Legalizing the Sale of Human Organs, In Hopes of Putting the Black Market Out of Business Right now in the U.S. even with all the advanced technology, there are more than 120,000 people currently on the UNOS organ transplant waiting list. With the wait being so long for an organ, people have become desperate in order to save their life. With this number being so large, it is hard to believe that there is a new name added to the list every twelve minutes. By names being added daily and not enough organs to go around, the death toll is an average of 21 people daily because their number never came up for their life-saving organ (Small-Jordan, 2016). Among these 120,000 people†¦show more content†¦The brokers of the black markets tend to prey on low economic areas because these people are uneducated and are desperate for money. The brokers knowing the situation tend to exploit the donor in every transaction that is made. In order for the black market not to be able to explo it the donor, organs sales should be legalized because then the donor could receive better medical attention, guarantee the donor is compensated fairly, and help shorten the currently long waiting list. The way the black market works is that the broker goes to very low economic areas and preys on the people who are desperate for money. Many of these people who live in areas such as these are not very educated when it comes to what all is involved. Like any surgery, during an organ transplant surgery, there are always risks. Since the black market is an illegal operation, the donor is not made aware of these risks and there are many times when the donor is forgotten once the surgery has been completed. While these donors are being forgotten there are times when the donor needs further medical treatment after surgery (Shafer Cunningham, 2011). The brokers through the black market don’t concern themselves if further medical attention is needed because they have already got ten what they wanted and the donor is no longer needed by them. Different doctors around the world have been voicing

The Tragedy Of Oedipus The King - 977 Words

The Greek drama â€Å"Oedipus The King† evidently leads to the unveiling of a tragedy. Oedipus, the protagonist of the play uncovers his tragic birth story and the curse he had been baring his whole life. Oedipus is notorious for his personal insight that helped him defeat Sphinx, which lead him to becoming the king of Thebes. He is admired by the people of Thebes and is considered to be a mature, inelegant and a rational leader. From his birth, his story began with a prophecy that Oedipus would grow up to kill his father and marry his mother. Through out the play numerous people, who tell him of his unknown past, visit Oedipus. Blind to the truth he casts them away until a blind man named Therisis gives a sight of truth to Oedipus. As Oedipus learns the truth he realizes the great evil his life carries. After finding his wife and also mother hung in her bedroom, Oedipus blinds himself with the gold pins that held Jocasta’s robe. Oedipus blind to the truth is finally ab le to see when the old blind man visits him and tells him the truth about his life. Both metaphorically and physically sight plays a significant role in understanding the irony of a blind man seeing the truth while Oedipus who isn’t blind doesn’t seem to the truth that’s right in front of him. A well-written tragedy is filled with irony. Oedipus The King is a great representation of a dramatic irony play. When reading the play the audience is very much aware of the outcome of the hero’s action far before the heroShow MoreRelatedThe Tragedy Of Oedipus Oedipus The King 1974 Words   |  8 Pages1/26/16 Thesis: Despite the fact that Oedipus sentenced himself to be exiled and put other people to shame, Oedipus should have pursued the truth about his destructive past regardless. He had to fulfill his duty as king to save his people from the plague, and he ultimately had no choice but to accept his own fate. Sub-claim- Oedipus should not have pursued the truth ( PART OF INTRO )Destructive past ( it was fate) Prophecy Killed man Events out of control Oedipus should not have put other peopleRead MoreThe Tragedy Of Oedipus The King1365 Words   |  6 PagesAlthough Sophocles’ Oedipus the King seems to be a play merely focused on the tragedy that is the tale of Oedipus, it is actually a commentary on defying the gods for the reason that one is blindly believing in supernatural entities and allowing those entities to govern one’s fate. The tragedy of Oedipus the King revolves around a king’s downfall as he tries to save his people from utter destruction. His curiosity and drive to save his city brings him to the realization that not only has his entireRead MoreThe Tragedy Of Sophocles Oedipus The King )1044 Words   |  5 PagesThe Forgotten Ones (Describe the Significance of the Chorus in Sophocles’ Oedipus the King) Oedipus the King is a famous play written by the renowned author Sophocles and first acted out back in 429 BC. It is the second of three plays written by Sophocles that dealt with Oedipus; the first one being Oedipus at Colonus and the last one being Antigone. This play relates the story of Oedipus, a man who becomes King of Thebes while unwittingly fulfilling an old prophecy that said that he would killRead MoreOedipus The King : A Classical Tragedy1272 Words   |  6 PagesSophocles’ Oedipus the King is a classical tragedy that derives its meaning through the experiences of its tragic hero, Oedipus. Throughout the play, the eminent characteristic of Oedipus is his ignorance of the truth that inevitably leads to his downfall. This ignorance of truth is a characteristic found within the Aristotelian definition of a tragedy. Tragedy, as defined by Aristotle in his Poetics, are imitations of actions and are not narrative. This means that tragedies are often demonstratedRead Mo reOedipus the King as a Tragedy Essay539 Words   |  3 Pages Many things can describe a tragedy. However, according to definition of a tragedy by Aristotle, there are only five. The play has to have a tragic hero, preferably of noble stature. Second, the tragic hero must have a tragic flaw. Because of that flaw, the hero falls from either power or death. Due to the fall, the tragic hero discovers something. Finally, there must be catharsis in the minds of the audience. Oedipus Rex qualifies as a tragedy. It fits all the characteristics as definedRead MoreThe Tragedy Of Sophocles Oedipus The King Essay1490 Words   |  6 PagesSophocles’ â€Å"Oedipus the King,† successfully demonstrates Aristotle’s definition of tragedy. According to Aristotle â€Å"tragedy† is vastly different from what one would likely describe if requested in modern times. It is common today to hear one speak of a tragic vehicular crash, but what is being spoken of as a tragedy, is an accident, not a tragedy. Thus, it is important to understand what Aristotle thought when he spoke of a â€Å"tragedy.† Based on Aristotle, POETICS, CHAPTER VI, The tragedy is an imitationRead MoreThe Greek Tragedy of Oedipus the King 971 Words   |  4 PagesA Greek tragedy is one with a tragic outcome that is an inevitable result of the key characters personal flaws. It is a calamity he or she was destined to. However, is it possible that a hero’s laudable qualities could lead to his or her catastrophic fate? Oedipus demonstrates several admirable qualities that are portrayed throughout Oedipus the King by Sophocles. Compassion, diligence, and justness are three qualities that contribute to the internal struggles that Oedipus faces resulting in hisRead MoreOedipus The King : A Master Of Tragedy889 Words   |  4 PagesSophocles were well-known as a master of tragedy. Sophocles was born at Colonus, not far from Athens. Sophocles wrote over 100 different dramatic stories. â€Å"Oedipus the King† is one of his great stories that has a mix of heroics to it and yet, we feel sorry for Oedipus and his fate that was handed to him. We ask ourselves after reading â€Å"Oedipus the King† who was this man and why did he think he could run from his destiny of fate. Was Oedipus responsible for his final fate and could he have changedRead MoreThe Tragedy Of Oedipus The King By Sophocles2776 Words   |  12 Pagesthem with. In the tragedy, Oedipus the King by Sophocles, Oedipus’ fate starts with a prophecy. No matter how much Oedipus tries to do the â€Å"right† thing, the prophecy comes to term. It is argument-able that Oedipus was led to his tragic ending by fate. It is also possible that his tragic ending was brought open by his own actions. The idea of fate and free will both played an important role in Oedipus’ downfall. Even though he was a victim of fate. It did not control him. Oedipus was destined to killRead MoreThe Tragedy Of Oedipus The King2114 Words   |  9 PagesSophocles’ play Oedipus The King is the second tragic drama in his series of The Three Theban Plays and follows the events of misery of protagonist Oedipus, the new king of Thebes, after he killed his father and marries his mother without having a sense of awareness of their true identities in relation to him. The true downfall of the king of Thebes begins, however, at the point when he does eventually realize what deeds he has done and decides to punish himself by self-mutilating and blinding himself

Euripide free essay sample

# 8217 ; s Medea Essay, Research Paper Medea # 8217 ; s Revenge Medea, a drama by the Grecian dramatist Euripides, explores the Greek-barbarian duality through the character of Medea, a princess from the # 8221 ; barbaric # 8221 ; , or non-Greek, land of Colchis. Throughout the drama, it becomesevident to the reader that Medea is no ordinary adult female by Grecian standards.Central to the whole secret plan is Medea # 8217 ; s barbaric beginnings and how they are relatedto her actions. In this paper, I am trying to reply inquiries such as howMedea behaves like a female, how she acts heroically from a male point of position, why she killed her kids, if she could hold achieved her end without killingthem, if the slaying was motivated by her barbaric beginnings, and how she dealswith the hurting of killing her kids. As an debut to the drama, the position of adult females in Greek societyshould be briefly discussed. In general, adult females had really few rights. In theeyes of work forces, the chief intents of adult females in Grecian society were to make houseworksuch as cookery and cleansing, and bear kids. They could non vote, ownproperty, or take a hubby, and had to be represented by work forces in all legalproceedings. In some ways, these Grecian adult females were about similar slaves. There isa definite relationship between this subordination of adult females and what transpiresin the drama. Jason decides that he wants to disassociate Medea and marry theprincess of Corinth, projecting Medea aside as if they had neer been married.This kind of activity was acceptable by Grecian criterions, and shows thesubordinate position of the adult female, who had no say in any affair like this. Even though some of Medea # 8217 ; s actions were non typical of the averageGreek adult female, she still had attitudes and emotions common among adult females. Forinstance, Medea speaks out against adult females # 8217 ; s position in society, proclaiming thatthey have no pick of whom to get married, and that a adult male can free themselves of a adult female to acquire another whenever he wants, but a adult female ever has to # 8220 ; maintain [ her ] eyes on one alone. # 8221 ; ( 231-247 ) Though it is unlikely that adult females went aroundopenly stating things of this nature, it is likely that this attitude was sharedby most or all Grecian adult females. Subsequently in the drama, Medea debates with herself overwhether or non to kill her kids: # 8220 ; Poor bosom, allow them travel, have commiseration uponthe children. # 8221 ; ( 1057 ) . This shows Medea # 8217 ; s motherly inherent aptitudes in that she caresabout her kids. She struggles to make up ones mind if she can carry through her end ofrevenge against Jason without killing her kids because she cares for themand knows they had no portion in what their male parent did. Unfortunately, Medea # 8217 ; sdesire to demand retaliation on Jason is greater than her love for her kids, andat the terminal of the drama she kills them. Medea was besides a faithful married woman to Jason.She negotiations about how she helped Jason in his pursuit for the Golden Fleece, thenhelped him flight, even killing her ain brother. ( 476-483 ) . The fact that shewas willing to bewray her ain household to be with Jason shows her trueness to him.Therefore, her choler at Jason over him disassociating her is apprehensible. On the other manus, Medea shows some heroic qualities that were notcommon among Grecian adult females. For illustration, Medea is willing to kill her ain brotherto be with Jason. In classical Greece, adult females and killing were likely notcommonly linked. When she kills her brother, she shows that she is willing todo what is necessary to # 8220 ; acquire the occupation done # 8221 ; , in this instance, to be with Jason.Secondly, she shows the bravery to stand up to Jason. She believes that she hasbeen cheated and betrayed by him. By be aftering ways t o acquire back at him forcheating on her, she is standing up for what she believes, which in this instance isthat she was wronged by Jason, but in a larger sense, she is talking out against the inferior position of adult females, which efficaciously allows Jason to fling Medea at will. Third, she shows that she is cagey and resourceful. Ratherthan use physical force to carry through her programs, she uses her head alternatively: # 8220 ; it is best to # 8230 ; do away with them by poison. # 8221 ; ( 384-385 ) While physical strengthcan be considered a epic quality, inventiveness can be every bit good. She does in factpoison the princess and the male monarch of Corinth ; interestingly, nevertheless, she doesnot toxicant them straight. # 8220 ; I will direct the kids with gifts # 8230 ; to thebride # 8230 ; and if she wears them upon her tegument # 8230 ; she will die. # 8221 ; ( 784-788 ) Thisshows her inventiveness because she is seeking to maintain from being linked to the offense, though everyone is able to calculate out that she was responsible anyway.In a manner, though, she is about anti-heroic because she is non making the # 8220 ; dirtywork # 8221 ; herself, which makes her look slightly cowardly. Finally, there is therevenge factor. Many times heroes were out for retaliation against person who didthem or a friend incorrect, and in this instance Medea is no exclusion, since she wantsto have revenge against Jason for disassociating her without merely cause. There are two chief grounds why Medea decides to kill her kids. Thefirst, and more obvious one, is that she feels that it is a perfect manner tocomplement the decease of the princess in acquiring retaliation on Jason. When shetells the chorus of the programs to kill the kids, they wonder if she has theheart to kill her kids, to which she replies, # 8220 ; [ y ] Es, for this is the bestway to injure my husband. # 8221 ; ( 817 ) . This shows that she believes that by killingher kids, she wil l fundamentally destroy Jason # 8217 ; s life, efficaciously acquiring herrevenge. The 2nd ground for Medea killing her kids has nil to dowith rhenium venge. If she left her children with Jason, they would be living in asociety that would look down upon them since they have partly barbarian origins.She did not want her children to have to suffer through that. Also, if herchildren are mocked for being outsiders, then this reflects badly on Medea, andshe said that she does not want to give her enemies any reason to laugh at her.(781-782) Since she does not want to leave her children with Jason, they reallyhave no place else to where they could go, being barbarians in a Greek city:†[m]y children, there is none who can give them safety.† (793) For these tworeasons, Medea decides that killing her children is the best way to accomplishher plan: getting revenge and keeping her children away from Jason. Whether or not Medea could have accomplished her goal without killingher children is debatable. On one hand, if we look at Medea’s objective only asseeking revenge against Jason, then she could have accomplished that wi thoutkilling her children. Killing the princess, Jason’s new wife, would causeenough grief for Jason so that her goal would be accomplished. We can inferthat the death of Jason’s wife would be more damaging to him than the deaths ofhis children because Jason was going to let Medea take the children with herinto exile and did not try to keep them for himself. Therefore, once theprincess was dead, killing the children, while it causes additional grief for Jason, really is not necessary. Even though Medea does not seem to believe it, killing her children probably causes more pain for her than Jason. She justdoes not see it because she is so bent on revenge against Jason. On the otherhand, if we define Medea’s objective in two parts, one being revenge, and theother to keep the children away, then it is possible that she had to kill herchildren. As for the revenge part, it was not necessary that she kill herchildren for the reasons just discussed. However, she may ha ve needed to killthem to keep Jason from getting them. If Jason decided he wanted his children,there is not much Medea could do about it, other than kill them. Also, it ispossible that she did not want to take them with her into exile because theycould make it more difficult for her to reach Athens. For whatever the reason,however, it is probable that she needed to kill her children to carry out herplan, since she accomplished two different goals through their deaths. The murder of Medea’s children is certainly caused in part by herbarbarian origins. The main reason that Jason decides to divorce Medea to marrythe princess is that he will have a higher status and more material wealth beingmarried to the king’s daughter. (553-554) In other words, Jason believes thatMedea’s barbarian origins are a burden to him, because there is a stigmaattached to that. In his mind, having the chance to be rich outweighs the loveof a barbarian wife. Medea’s barbarian status is a burden to herself as well.Once separated from Jason, she becomes an outsider with no place to go, becausethe barbarians were not thought too highly of in Greek society. Had Medea notbeen a barbarian, it is likely that Jason would not have divorced her, andtherefore, she would not have had to kill her children. But since she is abarbarian, this sets in motion the events of the play, and in her mind the bestcourse of action is to kill her children. Just because she is non-Greek doesnot necessarily mean that her way of thinking would be different from theGreeks; in other words, her way of thinking did not necessarily cause her tokill her children. Medea deals with the pain that the deaths of her children cause herquite well. She does this by convincing herself that her revenge against herhusband was worth the price of her children’s death. When asked about killingher children, she replies, â€Å"So it must be. No compromise is possible.† (819)This shows that she is bent on revenge, and that she is justifying their deathsto get her revenge. However, she does struggle with her decision to kill them.She is sad that she must take their lives, but also tells herself that it is intheir best interests, as evidenced by what she says to her children: â€Å"I wish you happiness, but not in this world.† (1073) She does not seem to have a problemwith killing her children once it comes time to actually carry out the act. Buther motherly instincts will not allow her to totally abandon her children afterthey are dead, as she decides to hold a yearly feast and sacrifice at theirburial site. (1383-1384) But in the end, we can see that she dealt with thepain surprisingly well. Two main themes are present in Medea: Medea’s barbarian origins, andher desire for revenge against Jason. Her barbarian status is really whatstarts the actions of the play. It is what makes her a less desirable wife toJason than the princess, and causes him to leave her. Thi s then leads to herthoughts of revenge against Jason, and her decision to kill her children as away to exact that revenge. As far as revenge goes, Medea is heroic in that sheis standing up against an evil done to her. Throughout most of the play, shespends her time plotting her revenge against Jason, waiting until the rightmoment to unleash her plan. She uses her cleverness to trick Jason and theothers into believing that she was not upset with him. In the end, we can seethat Medea’s barbarian origins were a major factor in the play, and that Medeawas no ordinary woman in Greek terms. _